Giorgio, Childress et all, make utterly unsubstantiated and unverified claims based on anomalies that have occurred throughout history. The most commonly used words and phrases on the show are 'maybe', 'perhaps', 'it is said', 'ancient aliens theorists claim that' and so on. The images shown are anomalous that it true, but that is all they are, anomalous, and to base an entire hypothesis that everything that our ancestors did was at the behest of, or with the assistance of, ET's is deeply flawed. Why is there never anyone who understands this phenomenon to give an alternative view and why is there this basic assumption that our ancient ancestors were too stupid of lacked the expertise to achieve the magnificent examples of civil engineering that they did? The show is designed to appeal to a specific audience that either uncritically and unquestioningly buys into the ancient alien hypothesis, or has no real interest in the matter and lacks the background knowledge to make a judgement.
Subject: The ethos of the show Date: 26/11/2018